| Brand: Russell Athletic
Department: Mens
Buy New: $13.99 - $17.99 (On sale from $24.99)
Amazon.com
Usually ships in 24 hours
Essential Apparel  7409 reviews
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Fogdog  20507 reviews
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Rating:  9 reviews
Sales Rank: 237
Fabric Type: Cotton
Color: *
Clothing Size: One Size
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 9.9 x 6.6 x 2.8
Model: R8643MO
ASIN: B000M9N0LA
|
Customer Reviews: Read 4 more reviews...
 50% polyester Peformance Cotton? September 8, 2007
md55 (Nevada City,CA)
7 out of 7 found this review helpful
These are listed as 100% cotton in the description but the graphite and grey heather colors are 50% and 52% polyester respectively.
 not cotton only October 12, 2007
Clint Eastwood (US)
7 out of 7 found this review helpful
I called the Amazon rep. I just got my pants and the Oxford color is 58% polyester and 42% cotton and the Graphite color is 50% cotton and 50% polyester.
I was looking for 100% cotton track pants and were disappointed.
So the description of the pants which says 100% cotton is wrong and is to be corrected.
itchy scrathy June 7, 2007
seeker ken (ny)
6 out of 11 found this review helpful
like sandpaper
not real soft cotton
gave me the heebee geebees
 Lightweight Athletic pants June 11, 2007
Terry (San Antonio)
5 out of 5 found this review helpful
These pants are a lightweight cotton jersey. They feature straight hemmed legs - no elastic around the ankles. The sizing is generous, as are the pockets. The waistline is elastic and also has a hidden drawstring inside the waistband. I got them to use a part of a costume but they would be an excellent summer lounge pant or work-out pant.
Poor description of product April 3, 2008
David R. Willis
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
This product indicates 100% cotton. When received I discovered it was 50/50 cotton/polyester. Since i am allergic to polyester, I had to return the item/s as I ordered 2 pair. I have not heard from the company yet in 6 weeks for a refund. Do I pay shipping on a poorly described item?
I hope not....
|
