Epson Perfection 4180 Photo Scanner | 
| Brand: Epson
List Price: $199.99
Buy Used: $99.99
You Save: $100.00 (50%)
Rating:  21 reviews
Media: Electronics
Shipping Weight (lbs): 12
Dimensions (in): 21.6 x 15.2 x 7.8
MPN: B11B170011
Model: B11B170011
UPC: 010343850880
EAN: 0010343850880
ASIN: B0002P4UM2
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Scanner & AC adapter ONLY!!! Has some scratches. NO FILM HOLDER NO BOX Manual & Software can be downloaded from company website.
| |
| Features:
| • | Up to 4,800 x 9,600 dpi resolution, 48-bit color, 16-bit grayscale | | • | Epson scan and productivity software, Adobe PhotoShop Elements 2.0 | | • | Scans multiple 35mm slides, negatives, and medium-format transparencies | | • | Copy, scan, save, and scan-to-email directly from the front panel | | • | USB interface, cable included; PC and Mac compatible |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The Epson Perfection 4180 Photo is the ideal scanner for amateur photographers. It's great for scanning film and photos at a classleading 4800dpi resolution, has a large built-in film adapter that handles multiple film formats and includes photo restoration tools.The Epson Perfection 4180 Photo is the perfect partner for the photo enthusiast. Whether you want to make enlargements of your favorite images, archive your old films and photos or even add new life to faded memories, this scanner is the complete solution to meet all your needs.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 16 more reviews...
 Raises the bar for budget photo scanners September 26, 2004
Just a photog (Loess Hills)
88 out of 93 found this review helpful
It's hard to believe that the first flatbed I bought back in 1997 only had 300dpi optical, no transparency function at all and cost $300. Times do change.
I have only had my 4180 for a few days but so far the perfromance is quite impressive. Flatbed scans of photographs and documents are nice and crisp. I haven't done any negative scans but I did load in some of my favorite Kodachromes and the results were quite good.
Scanning transparencies at 3200dpi gave excellent results in prints up into the 8X10 range. I suspect that you could crank this thing up to the point where you would run out of grain before you run out of pixels.
The supplied scanning software, which includes Photoshop Elements is pretty easy to navigate and did not present any problems for me.
My first batch of prints from slides were at least as pretty as the Cibachromes I used to do, that's saying a lot.
Naturally a flatbed does not have the same dynamic range on transparencies that a dedicated film scanner would. Even so I am pleasantly surprised at the quality of slide scans I am getting right out of the box.
I would like to have seen hard copies of the documentation but I can live without it if it knocks the price down some.
I have a basement full of equipment in storage and have been agonizing about building another darkroom.
I'm going to miss watching prints come up in the developer but this is so easy and the results are so good that I'm afraid my days under the safelight are over.
One last point. You may want to make sure you have lots of RAM if you buy this unit. Four 3200dpi slide scans are going to deal you four 25Meg files.
So far the 4180 looks like a good choice for a photographer on a budget.
Note 9-20-05
As one of our IT guys kindly pointed out, RAM is not the issue I had thought. I am told the temporary files generated by large scans end up on one of the hard drives and are not stored in RAM while being processed.
Otherwise I would have to still say that this represents a terrific value for a photographer watching their budget. I have done a lot of negative scans both in color and B&W since writing the original review. These have been quite satisfactory. The B&W roll film scans are especially pleasing.
Hope this helps.
 Doesn't live up to its promises October 15, 2004
Kelly H
83 out of 88 found this review helpful
I bought this scanner to replace my Epson Perfection 1240U (which wasn't broken but dusty under the glass, why? why?). I thought it would be nice to be able to scan negatives or really zoom in some old photos (where it seems like you have lots of people waaay far away). NOT! I tried every which way but the quality of a scanned negative stunk. There was so much noise & grain, it didn't come close to the quality of the "real" photo, even at a small size. I used Adobe Photoshop 6, which can use files of 48-bit depth, and tried processing the files but didn't see much improvement.
I'm sure it's not a bad scanner, I just don't think you're getting an improvement over a 2400 x 4800 scanner. For now, I returned mine and will try something else.
**Update**
I purchased the Canon 4200F scanner and have had a much better result with scans of 35mm negatives. Particularly, on comparison, I noticed a lot of "color bleed" on the Epson scans, and none on the Canon. I am posting a review on the Canon.
Excellent value January 25, 2005
D. Bivins (Brooklyn, NY, USA)
68 out of 68 found this review helpful
This scanner performs well for the user who expects very good scans from flatbed and negatives/transparencies at this price point.
PROS:
Costs under $200.
Scans negatives and transparencies--35mm, mounted slides, and 120.
Includes very easy-to-use-and-integrate software.
Installs easily (on WinXP SP2).
Makes scans that are very usable in Photoshop CS.
Is able to make scans that I don't need to mess with (for web, email) without using Photoshop.
CONS:
35mm holder allows filmstrip to buckle.
Minor software tweaks would be desirable.
No good way to store film holders when one of them is in use.
I'm an amateur photographer who develops his own film. I had been getting my film developed by an excellent, and inexpensive, local chain that also provided a CD-ROM of scanned images for each roll processed. Once I started developing my own b/w film, I wanted a scanner that could do decent scans so that I could continue to keep medium-resolution "contact sheets" on my PC. I thought that the 4180 might do the trick at a pretty inexpensive price point. I was right.
It scans well, within timeframes that are reasonable. I've read other reviews here, and I'm not sure what everyone expects of their scanners--but given your connection (USB 2.0, etc.) and whatever else you have going on, I think you'll find this scanner performs as expected. It takes a while to do medium-to-hi-res scans, but that's what I expect of a scanner. I expect it to transmit to my PC pretty darn quick, but the scanning part can take its time.
The scanner software does not always detect the framelines between 35mm frames correctly. I think this might be what another reviewer was referring to regarding black lines. Usually, re-previewing the set of frames corrects this. Worst case scenario, you just preview and scan the whole set of frames and then go back and scan that problematic one individually. It's really not a big deal.
If you're intending to scan a great deal of 35mm negatives, slides, or 120 transparencies/negatives quickly, then this is not the right scanner for you. The provided film holders don't hold a lot of frames. I do appreciate being able to scan 12 35mm negatives simultaneously, but when you're dealing with rolls of 24-36, it does take some time. Luckily you don't have to be present during most of the scanning process.
The 35mm frame is very good at holding the film, but because it isn't a sandwich of glass, it does not hold your film flat if it's not flat already. Artifacts in the resulting scan are common, especially at the ends of 35mm strips.
The software should have a way of overriding the "selection" of frames by the software. Usually it's accurate, but when it's not I'd rather not have to redo a single scan because the software selected a too-narrow area or one that overlaps two frames.
The enclosed software is very good. It includes a densitometer, editable histogram, and other tools for working with your scans. I have not worked much with the grain removal and dust/scratch removal tools, but I'm more comfortable working with those problems in Photoshop.
For excellent thumbnails and fast, very good printable scans, I've found this scanner to be excellent.
 Perfection until it breaks October 9, 2004
Thomas R. Dustrude
34 out of 34 found this review helpful
The good: The 4180 does deliver a lot for the money. I have used this scanner primarily for Kodachrome slide capture and the color accuracy is very very good. At 4800 dpi it produces a 35mm slide with a 113MB Bitmap so choose your scanning resolution carefully. The enclosed Photoshop software will quickly fix or improve many "problems". The scanner software interface is easy and intuitive, especially under "home" mode.
The bad: I'm on my 3rd scanner in as many weeks. At scan #500, a CCD failed, leaving me with a green line across all my slides. Scans of photos did not have this same problem. One week after that a RED line at scan #1000. Now I have the same thing at scan #1200 only it's intermittant, and is a blue line. The good news is that tech. support is knowledgeable and friendly. They can only tell me to exchange it or send it in under warranty. Examining each slide wondering which ones I need to re-scan, or wondering if it will get worse is not an experience I'd wish upon anyone. Obviously I cannot recommend purchase of this scanner, but if you do, purchase an exchange or extended warranty with it.
Inadequate Software October 27, 2004
David C
34 out of 45 found this review helpful
The software provided to operate the scanner is woefully inadequate.
One of the things I need to do is scan documents for electronic filing. For this I need a fast scan and a small file. Two programs are provided for this sort of work. Epson
Scan is very fast, provides small files but will not scan multiple page documents - you wind up with lots of files. No way of merging them is provided.
The other program - Epson Smart panel will scan multiple documents but it is ponderously slow and produces very large files.
There is no way of fast scanning multiple pages with small files. Epson support suggest third party software. I have solved the problem by using PaperPort but this is inconvenient.
A scanner of this quality deserves better software than this.
|
|
|
