Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras | 
| Brand: Canon
List Price: $320.00 Buy New: $188.99 You Save: $131.01 (41%)
New (40) Used (1) from $169.99
Rating: 118 reviews
Media: Electronics Autographed: No Memorabilia: No Fragile: No Batteries Included: No Optical Zoom: 4 Maximum Focal Length: 300 Minimum Focal Length: 75 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1 Dimensions (in): 6.9 x 4.5 x 4.2 Warranty: 1 year warranty
MPN: C219892 Model: 6472A002 UPC: 082966214080 EAN: 0082966214080 ASIN: B00004THCZ
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Condition: Brand New , open box . SHIPPED IMMEDIATELY WITH USPS FOR FASTER SERVICE.Satisfaction Guarantee!
| |
| Features:
| • | 75-300mm telephoto zoom lens with f/4.5-5.6 maximum aperture for Canon SLR cameras | | • | Micro ultra-sonic monitor (USM) makes autofocusing quicker and quieter than before | | • | Improved zoom mechanism with silver on the front; 4.9-foot close focus distance | | • | Ideal for shooting sports, portraits, and wildlife; lightweight frame weighs 16.8 ounces | | • | Measures 2.8 inches in diameter and 4.8 inches long; 1-year warranty |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description Compact and lightweight 4x telephoto zoom lens ideal for shooting sports, portraits, and wildlife. The newly developed Micro USM makes autofocusing quicker and quieter. The improved zoom mechanism also makes zooming smoother. The front part of the zoom ring now sports a silver ring for a luxury touch.
Amazon.com Product Description This compact and lightweight EF 75-300mm telephoto zoom lens is ideal for shooting sports, portraits, and wildlife. The lens is distinguished by a newly developed micro ultra-sonic monitor (USM) that makes autofocusing quicker and quieter, along with an improved zoom mechanism that includes a silver ring on the front for a luxurious touch. The micro USM makes this version of the lens particularly suitable for applications that require a fast autofocus, such as sporting events or wildlife shoots. Best of all, the USM version shares many of the same features that makes the non-USM lens so popular, such as a compact size, a close focusing range, and accessory compatibility. As with all Canon lenses, this unit carries a one-year warranty. - Focal length: 75-300mm
- Maximum aperture: 1:4.5-5.6
- Lens construction: 13 elements in 9 groups
- Diagonal angle of view: 32 degrees (at 11 feet) to 8 degrees (at 15 feet)
- Focus adjustment: Front group rotating extension system with USM
- Closest focusing distance: 4.9 feet
- Zoom system: Rotating type
- Filter size: 58mm
- Dimensions: 2.8 inches in diameter, 4.8 inches long
- Weight: 16.8 ounces
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 113 more reviews...
Buy the "IS" version instead August 30, 2001 H. Huntzinger (Denville, NJ USA) 467 out of 489 found this review helpful
If you're looking at this lens, you're more demanding than the average Joe who takes photos and have high expectations. This lens is not blazingly fast (f/5.6 at 300mm), and to reliably freeze camera shake, you're going to need a 1/500 sec shutter speed, which means that with ISO 100 film, you only can lose one stop of illumination under "Sunny 16" conditions before you have to decide comprimise somewhere to get your shot. Consequently, shots into the shade, or conducted under the warmer and softer lighting conditions of the morning/evening will inevitably drive you to the comprimise of a high ISO grainy film or the bulk of a tripod to make up for this lens's lack of optical speed. If you always shoot in full noon sunshine, you'll be okay. Even though its a great tool, most people don't like to carry a tripod, so the solution is to either accept grain in enlargements, not take certain photos, spend more money to go to a faster lens, or some combination of the above. I'll say it again: the most cost-effective alternative is to use a tripod. The next cost-effective alternative is Canon's "IS" (Image Stabilization) lens technology. There are two contenders in this focal length, the 75-300mm IS and the 100-400mm IS. The former is nearly a duplicate of this lens.... The latter is a 3 lb pro lens.... Of these two, the 75-300mm IS is the bargain. I started with this lens and after just a few test rolls, returned it and got the 75-300mm IS. The IS technology reliably affords an additional effective two stops of speed, although it cannot be used to freeze subject motion as the shutter will normally also do. But it makes the use of high quality films, such as Fuji Velvia (ISO 50), Kodachrome 64 and even Ekta (Kodak Royal Gold) ISO 25 feasible. -hh
Tough for sports October 31, 2000 M. Johnson (San Diego, CA USA) 157 out of 169 found this review helpful
An OK lens for shooting fixed objects and panoramas, but the autofocus is frustratingly slow and almost impossible to use on moving subjects. Limited utility of this lens may explain why it is now often found at fire sale prices.
Could be better, but works well within its price range December 19, 2005 John Nolley II (Vienna, VA United States) 150 out of 152 found this review helpful
After reading several online reviews of the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM lens, I had nearly talked myself out of even looking at one. However, thanks to a local Canon demonstration, I was able to play with several lenses, the 75-300mm f/4-5.6 among them. I got to try it out alongside the IS version (which costs just under 3x as much), the non-USM version, and some of their L-series professional lenses. That said, I found there to be less difference among the directly-comparable lenses (the non-USM, USM, and IS versions) than I'd have thought. On the test shots I took using a Canon Digital Rebel XT, I didn't find full-zoom telephoto shots to be appreciably softer in the non-IS version reviewed herein, nor were the images overly soft for my liking period. The USM focusing didn't seem to make as much of a difference as I'd expected over the non-USM model, either. Focusing was still relatively slow (as other reviewers have pointed out), although once an initial focus has been made, adjustments aren't too slow unless changing to a subject substantially nearer or farther away. HOWEVER, the AF engine did make a number of "mistakes" when using this lens that it did not using the IS lens (or, of course, the L-series glass); more than once I had to either switch to manual focus or try multiple times to get the right focus "lock." Furthermore, the USM model doesn't get you internal focus, either, like with higher-end lenses, so the end still rotates during focusing, which can be problematic with a circular polarizer or other filters. Overall, I'd say that you "get what you pay for"; this is a very inexpensive lens, and it shows in some areas. But it's not nearly as bad as some would make it out to be. I tried it out both on several indoors shots under less-than-ideal lighting conditions and was pleased in most respects, and outdoors, I got very good results on even moving subjects. Pros: -- Cost; at under $200, you would be hard-pressed to find a lens with the same reach with even half-decent optics. Cons: -- Slow focus -- Autofocus seems to confuse somewhat easily over the IS model -- The USM version is still not an internally-focusing model, and thus the end of the lens will still rotate (and can affect filters, etc.) I'd recommend the IS version if you have the extra funds, but if you are on a budget and just can't wait, I saw less of a difference than others have between the two. Of course, the real step up would be to a comparable piece of glass in the L series, but with it comes a real step up in price, too.
Great for amatuers and novices. January 28, 2002 MICHAEL DELGAUDIO (Davidsonville, MD USA) 68 out of 68 found this review helpful
This lens has been a helpful addition to my camera setup. I purchased this lens and a tripod at the same time. I have found that using this lens at max zoom really does require the use of a tripod, or other stabilization method (such as resting it on a table or railing). There is no way to handhold this lens at 300 mm and still get razor sharp pics. I use this lens to attach to my Canon Rebel 2000. As a beginning photographer I use 400 speed film for nearly all my shots, and have been pleased with the results. I generally do not make enlargements from my prints -- they just go in my photo album -- so the relative graininess of 400 speed is not noticable in 4x6 prints. Coupling this lens with a polarizing filter dramtically improved the contrast and sharpness of distant objects in bright daylight -- particularly distant mountains and scenery. As far as zoom goes, this lens picks up where the standard Rebel lens leaves off and really pulls in the distant objects well. I have not tried to use this lens to shoot fast moving objects at a great distance (such as sports) but for landscapes or distant objects -- perched birds, mountains, bridges, sunsets, I have found this lens to be an absolutely indispensable part of my kit. It attaches and detaches from the camera with ease. The autofocus system focuses within a second -- I've never needed to switch to manual. I knocked a star off because I wish it came with a carrying case. The lens has some heft to it -- it weighs as much as the standard Rebel Body - if not more. It definetly feels solid and well-made, but at the price (which is expensive for me) I feel like I have to treat it with kid gloves, and I can't find a carrying case for it. When I pack this lens in a carryon I stick it inside a few socks to make due.
great lens with few problems October 25, 2000 Mr. M. J. Christian (Sacramento, CA USA) 42 out of 43 found this review helpful
I upgraded from a 80-200 to this lens and have really appreciated the extra range. Sure this isn't a professional lens, but for us advanced amateurs it offers all the versatility at a very affordable price. My only problems with this lens is that focus tends to be slow and the barrel is a little stiff. I'd still highly recommend it though.
|
|
|