Epson Stylus R200 Photo Printer | 
| Brand: Epson
Buy New: $214.99
New (1) Used (1) from $84.00
Rating:  108 reviews
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Modem: None
Shipping Weight (lbs): 11.4
Dimensions (in): 18.5 x 10.5 x 7.8
MPN: R200
Model: R200
UPC: 010343849532
EAN: 0010343849532
ASIN: B0001FDPZ6
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Rare brand new in sealed retail box with ink and all accessories, sorry but will not ship to Hawaii, Alaska or any APO/FPO/PO Box address.
| |
| Features:
| • | 5,760 x 1,440 dpi maximum resolution, 3-picoliter drop size | | • | Up to 15 ppm color, 15 ppm black | | • | Economical printing with 6 individual ink cartridges | | • | Complete, easy-to-use CD and DVD face printing solution | | • | USB interface, PC and Mac compatible, 1-year warranty |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
EPSON C11C546011 STYLUS PHOTO R200 INKJET PRINTER
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 103 more reviews...
 Excellent CD/DVD printer October 29, 2004
Tom T (NC USA)
204 out of 205 found this review helpful
(Update. Sept 30, 2007): Almost 3 years old, it's been a real workhorse printing DVDs, and I still rate it a 5-star printer. It did recently have a clogged nozzle. My fault. I read inkjets work best when exercised regularly -- print at least one page a week -- but the printer sat idle for about a month while I was on an extended roadtrip. Upon my return, black did not print. Status Monitor indicated more than 1/2 tank of black, but the Nozzle Check pattern printed all colors except black. So, for the first time ever, I ran the Head Cleaner. (You don't want to do this unless ABSOLUTELY necessary because it uses up a LOT of ink from all 6 tanks. You cannot select just one color.) Still no black ink flowing.
This site has the best information I was able to find about how to clear a clogged Epson printer nozzle:
http://www.inkjetreview.ca/Articles/clogged_epson_nozzles.htm.
The first suggestion listed -- putting distilled water on the printhead sponges -- is what worked for me.
By the way, except for the tanks that came with R200, I never used Epson ink, and the printer ran just fine. Unfortunately, apparently the newer Epson inkjets use only Epson ink. The difference is that a complete set of generic R200 inks cost about as much as a single tank of Epson ink. So, I sure hope this R200 lives for at least another 3 years.
Here's my original review: Excellent printer. I purchased it only for the CD/DVD printing feature. However, I decided it'll also replace my Epson Stylus Photo 870 which, after 4 years of heavy use, continues to produce excellent results even with off-brand ink. By comparison, the R200 print quality is even better.
Here's some info that might be useful if you're about to buy the R200, or are still shopping:
It takes about 3 minutes to print 100% of the disk surface. Printing less, like one line of text on the top half of the disk, and one line of text on the bottom half - and no background graphic - takes about 1.5 minutes.
If you do a price check on a complete set of Epson brand ink cartridges for this printer, you'll see the cost is more than half the price of the printer. But, each color ink has a separate cartridge - so only the color that runs out has to be replaced, not the whole set.
The R200 does not include a USB cable, so you'll need to either buy a cable or use a spare if you have one.
It's important to read the section in the manual about printing disks before you try to print your first one. The steps are simple, but if you don't select the right settings for Printer Setup, the printhead might miss part of the disk.
I read some reviews here and at other sites which mentioned having problems using this printer with a Mac. So far I've printed on disks using both Epson Print CD and another CD printing app called Discus, and printed to letter-sized paper from programs including Word, Exel, Photoshop, QuarkXPress, TextEdit, Mail, and printed web pages without a single problem.
If you prefer to use Photoshop, Illustrator, or similar programs to create original designs, no problem. Both Epson Print CD and Discus import graphics files.
I've seen some comments on how quiet this printer is. It is very quiet printing, but it does make noticeable noise when it starts the job, especially when pulling in a sheet of paper to print. So, it's not totally quiet.
The R200 is the same as the R300 as far as quality and speed; it just lacks some extra features the R300 has that, in my case, I didn't think were worth the extra cost.
(Update) I'll add that I'm a wedding videographer, and print about 15 - 20 dvds plus dvd case covers, a week. I've lost count of exactly how many I've done with this printer, but I can say after 3 years the disk feeder tray and the whole unit still works perfectly.
(Update) I read one review here about a problem printing shipping labels. After connecting online with their sites, I regularly print both USPS Priority Mail and UPS shipping labels with the R200, and it's quick.
[Update) I have replaced the original ink cartridges several times already, but, because I'm using this printer for all my printing, it's difficult to estimate the average ink cost per disk -- maybe $.30 at most. I can state the R200 is by no means an ink hog. The Epson Photo 870, which this replaced, seemed to use (evaporate?) ink even when idle. Not so with this R200. Considering everything my R200 has printed so far, it was well worth the purchase price. If this machine ever decides to die, I'll definitely replace it with another Epson.
(Update) Well, altho I've had very good luck with this printer, I'm not sure about replacing it with with another Epson, because supposedly the new ones work ONLY with Epson ink. That would increase my printing costs 5-fold. I've read Canon inkjets are better, but none print directly on disks.
Overlooked Feature July 24, 2004
Nick Tropiano (Havertown, PA United States)
166 out of 191 found this review helpful
... all set to buy a Canon that cost $100 more than this, when I noticed it on a table at the retailer marked "customer return/clearance" at 1/2 price. I looked under the hood of the demo model... What?!! 6 (six) count'em individual ink tanks. That's a good thing. A very good thing. Most printers I've seen in the sub 100 price range have two ink tanks - 1 for black and one containing yellow, magneta, cyan. Or, only four ink tanks. Last time I was in the market for a printer, only the $300 models boasted six individual color tanks. Six tanks means that you can replace the individual inks as they run out - much more economical. Just as important, more colors means that subtle gradients in shading are handled more accurately. Just my opinion, but I don't think that you can call yourself a true photo-quality printer w/o six ink colors. Now for the negatives... there are none for the printer but some for folks who review them... 1. Yes, you'll need a USB cable. Get over it. 2. Yes, you'll eventually need to clean the nozzle which uses ink. Again, get over it. 3. Yes, your printer is calibrated for its make of photo paper. El-cheapo paper = sucky print. Again, get over it. 4. Yes, photo quality prints use quite a bit of ink for coverage. It's a consumable and quality ink is expensive to produce - get over it. 5. It takes a couple minutes to produce a print. Here's your option, spend a couple hundred more for a faster printer or learn a little patience. 6. Sometimes you buy stuff, take it home, and it's DOA. That's why there's a manufacturer's warranty and a store return policy. I read printer reviews and almost feel badly for the manufacturers. Here - by the nth generation of home printer, you can get what amounts to a home photo lab for less that 100 bucks. Fact of the matter is, you really can't go wrong with any of them. They all make terrific prints and do a decent job with text and graphics. Remarkable. Yey "Professional" reviewers beat them up over slight differences in print speed. "Users" vetch about there not being a USB cord. Huh? The only brand I would avoid is Lexmark. Fine printers but they charge $10 less than their competitor but absolutely gouge you on ink - by design, and it amounts to robbery. Prints from this thing are true photo lab quality. Easy set up, and it includes good software that I actually bothered to load - including a PIM color management Photoshop plug in. If you've read reviews of Epson's clogging by the way, don't be concerned. Those are the "stylus" models that use Durabrite inks, "the stylus photo" line, like this one, doesn't use Durabrite. Oh, and this has a gadget that prints labels directly on CD-Rs. Nice. But buy this for its six individual ink tanks. Truth is though, the "entry level" Canons, Epsons, HP's, are all pretty amazing.
 Not what it claims to be by any stretch July 3, 2004
T. J. Kramer (Ft. Walton Beach, Florida USA)
112 out of 160 found this review helpful
The good news.... OK it prints on white paper, and if you set it to its highest quality (slowest printing) it will turn out pretty decent photos. And on the off chance that you are able to load the CD/DVD tray into it exactly the way it wants, it will print on CD's relatively well.
Now for the real review of this printer: Text is abysmal, even on its best setting. I have a Canon i860, which in every way (text and graphics/photos) blows the doors off this Epson. Printing CD's which really is the ONLY actual reason anyone would buy this over ANY Canon, is a chore at best. You must print them one at time (choosing more than 1 copy craps out the tray alignment for the next copy, which brings on the error message) and it takes a REALLY LONG TIME. Don't get me wrong, the quality in "Best Photo" on CD's is pretty great.... but the hassle with the tray never being happy and the S L O W print speed is just not worth it. WAAAAAAAAYY better results are achieved using the Avery Afterburner kit and printing labels with ANY Canon printer. I had an Epson several years ago, and upon buying Canon, will never go back to Epson. The quality difference is measured in light years. But alas Canon has no CD printer in the U.S., only Europe. So if you're contemplating this as your primary printer, and just every once in a while will print to CD's... move on to another brand that is actually capable of printing clean black text. If you just need a printer to print 2 or 3 CD's a week, this will suffice.
Editing addendum... 8/04... I have noticed that nearly without exception, people vote that a reveiw was "helpful" if it is either 4 or 5 stars and it is an item for which the reader has mostly decided upon buying. The "not helpful" votes are almost always given by someone who is discouraged that any given product they want has been given a negative review. So I offer this addendum to my original review: Many of the positives tendered about the R200 printer are from people who have not actually used it very long and have certainly not made much/any use of the direct CD printing or text. So while you may have your heart set on this printer, and are somehow personally hurt by my review after my 60 days of real-world use, I say to you, buyer beware, and remember this review after you buy the R200 anyway against good advice.
CD/DVD Printing Makes It Worth The Price Alone April 22, 2004
51 out of 54 found this review helpful
When I first read about this printer in a computer magazine, I was immediately impressed by its functions and price point. CD/DVD printers cost $100's more and even then, they usually just serve that single function. Later that day, I went out and bought one.The R200 not only prints directly onto the discs, but is also a quality photo printer. You can print out crisp images with that function as well as carry out normal day-to-day tasks like homework and other documents. It's great because the printer has an extra USB port on the front of the machine for easy hookup to a laptop. The software for the printer is easy to install and there really was no printer alignment necessary. It did all the work for me. The only thing you really need to buy, if you don't already have one, is a USB cable because it doesn't come with one packed in the box. Yeah, I know. I was disappointed in that too, but the features made up for that. Speaking of features, in order to successfully print onto a disc, you must use an Ink-Jet printable disc. Otherwise, you'll have a disc with a pool of ink on it.
Best "Budget" Printer, All in the Specs. August 31, 2004
Ickna Ropianota
27 out of 27 found this review helpful
Printer has the highest resolution specs out there, and among the smallest "droplet size" at 3 picoliters. (Canon I960 is 2 picoliters, but less than 4 picoliters is invisible to naked eye. A couple years ago, the smallest droplet size available at any price, including pro-level inkjets, was 4 picoliters...) Has Epson's patented, (arguabley) superior micropiezo (as opposed to thermal) technology and high quality nozzles built onto print-head, not cheaply built into ink cartridges, like other manufacturers. This model uses six individual ink tanks to more accurately produce gradients instead of the usual four colors - another feature, until recently, found only on higher end models that Epson pushed down into this consumer printer. Net-net? Absolutely amazing quality photos that rival or exceed far more expensive printers or "pro-level" technology that's a couple years old. All for a hundred bucks. I've made several side-by-side comparisons between photos from the R200 and the local photo lab. R200 wins, hands down, no question about it. Bye-bye photo lab.
So as not to bastardize more expensive R300,R500 photo stylus line, Epson doesn't exactly tout R200's resolution. Note, resolution specs are not on the box of the R200, but are big and bold on the box for the other R-series models. The printers in the R-series are identical, except you must print from your PC with the R200, it doesn't connect direct to your digicam, or have media slots like the R300, 300M... If, like me, you tweak sharpness and adjust color levels - always, in a photo editor, before printing - you'll never use those features. Save your money; go with the R200.
As an added bonus this printer has the ability to produce professional quality graphics and text directly onto printable CDRs. A terrific, distinguishing feature that works very well. Another distinguishing feature is its ability to print borderless on every available paper size... don't take this for granted. Not all printers are this versitile when it comes to borderless. I use this printer for text as well as photos, and its text looks perfectly fine to my eyes. Is it "the best" ink jet text out there? Probably not, but I'll trade that capability any day for its superior photo quality.
Some pointers - to save on ink costs check out Abacus inks, and/or a software package called Ink Saver 2.0 (I would strongly recommended I.S. 2.0 to compensate for the R200's illegible text "draft" mode...) If you want to stick to Epson original inks, Altex (dot com) has the lowest price available.
On a final point, the build quality of this printer appears MUCH better than the other manufacturers entry level models. This printer, based on its superior specs, versitility, build quality, and price point is a fantastic value. Epson outdid themselves by aggressively pushing the technology from their premium models into the entry level R200 and giving it capabilities - like direct CD printing, that other printers simply don't have. Epson, therefore, has managed to leap-frog the other manufacturers in a the very crowded field of capable sub-onehundred dollar inkjet printers.
|
|
|
