Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Boys, Size S/M (38-65 Lbs), 27-Count Packages (Pack of 3) | 
| Brand: Pampers
Buy New: $51.00
New (2) from $51.00
Rating:  8 reviews
Sales Rank: 4687
Size: Boys S/M, 38-65 Lbs. (81 UnderJams)
Shipping Weight (lbs): 10.4
Dimensions (in): 15.4 x 12.3 x 10.9
ASIN: B0015MVHXQ
Release Date: April 14, 2008
Promotion: Data not available Terms and Conditions
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | Case Pack of three 27-count packages (81 total UnderJams) | | • | UnderJams absorbent underwear for bedwetters features NightLock absorbent core | | • | Made with quiet, cloth-like materials to help give kids the privacy they want | | • | Designed like underwear, lets skin breathe | | • | Night Wear with the quality you expect from Pampers |
|
| Similar Items:
| • | Pampers Cruisers, Size 4, Economy Plus Pack, 140 Cruisers | | • | Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Boys, Size L/XL (58-85 Lbs), 21-Count Packages (Pack of 3) | | • | Pampers Sensitive Baby Wipes Refills, Case Pack, Four - 210 Count Resealable Packages, 840 Total Wipes | | • | Pampers Baby Wipes Refills, Natural Aloe, Unscented, 770 Wipes | | • | Pampers UnderJams Night Wear For Girls, Size S/M (38-65 Lbs), 27-Count Packages (Pack of 3) |
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 3 more reviews...
 These are great! May 5, 2008
mommy to 3 boys (Florida)
15 out of 15 found this review helpful
I just tried these on my twin boys last night. They loved them! They are very soft and comfortable, and you would never know they were wearing a diaper-like product. Both of them still have nighttime accidents, and unlike other products we have tried, these didn't leak! The boys (and the bed) stayed dry and they like wearing them too. Finally a winner!
 Poor design from Pampers July 25, 2008
laugh462 (Georgia, USA)
3 out of 3 found this review helpful
My son is a tall 5 year old who usually wears Goodnites. We had a coupon for the Underjams and we've tried them for two weeks. We have had a wreck of leaks about 50% of the time, unfortunately. I can't establish exactly why, but it seems that it's due to the fact that they are lower cut (to avoid being seen above the waistline). The low cut does not work well with an active sleeper and folds down in the front. We are certainly going back to Goodnites!
 Very much like diapers, and they leak. :( July 24, 2008
Jenelle R. Brewer
2 out of 5 found this review helpful
I was looking forward to trying these with my 7-year-old son, who still has nighttime accidents and usually uses Goodnites. I liked the idea that they were supposed to be softer, more like real underwear. Well, the second I opened the package, my 7-year-old and 3-year-old boys were running around the house calling them diapers and making fun of them. Apparently, something about these reminds them of diapers whereas Goodnites do not...? I was also very disappointed to find that they are not able to hold in my 7-year-old's accidents like Goodnites do. We NEVER have a problem with leakage in the Goodnites, but most certainly did with these. Poor kid was soaked.
Problems with leaks July 24, 2008
Red Frog
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
We bought these after trying a free sample of UnderJams, and my son liked the way they felt over the Goodnights. The sample worked fine. Well, 3 out of the 4 nights we used the UnderJams (after shelling out $50 for the 3 packages), we had major leaks that required full sheet changes in the middle of the night. By the 5th night, we were so tired, I went out and bought a package of Goodnights so we could get a full night sleep, and they worked like a charm, as usual. We are definitely going back to Goodnights. I am really disappointed in the UnderJams, and now I'm stuck with all these packages!
Finally - no sheets to change July 24, 2008
Busy Mom
I started using these for my 5 year old. They are the first nighttime pants that don't leak. He likes how they feel too.
|
|
|
