Customer Reviews:
 too beautiful to be true January 4, 2004
Rafael R C (Puerto la Cruz, Venezuela)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
The Seattle Times works extensively to make its pages the best designed in the US. They really do that job pretty good, but it seems they forgot to make the content as good as the layout. Yes, there are slight hopeful signs (their recent investigation on sexual assault by girls' sporting coaches for example) but honestly, I think there are better ways of doing the job. I still read it because of Larry Stone's baseball notebook, though. Other good articles are the TV reviews by Kay McFadden and the Q&A section on Personal Technology that runs on saturdays.
 An incomplete source of information March 2, 2003
3 out of 4 found this review helpful
Call me a spoiled person, but I lived in New York for a long time and I have some expectations for what should in a newspaper. First, a newspaper should have extensive local business coverage. Sincerely, it is ridiculous the number of pages dedicated to business, just a few pages everyday. Extracting adds and stock information, there are just two or three articles worth of reading. Secondly, I would expect extensive local news. However, Seattle Times provides just one or two flashy headlines and not much more information on local community issues. But do you know what? There is no other one...
 The best way to stay on top of local events in Seattle November 7, 2002
1 out of 5 found this review helpful
The Seattle Times is a great way to stay current with local events in Seattle and around the Northwest. It has great sports coverage, local politics & business, and coverage of national events that affect this region.
|
