Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium FULL VERSION [DVD] [OLD VERSION] | ![Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium FULL VERSION [DVD] [OLD VERSION]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ZyH809azL._SL500_.jpg)
| From: Microsoft Software
List Price: $239.95
Buy New: $138.85
You Save: $101.10 (42%)
New (11) from $138.85
Rating:  208 reviews
Sales Rank: 1035
Format: Dvd-rom
Platforms: Windows Xp, Windows Vista, Windows 2000
Media: DVD-ROM
Edition: Full Version
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Batteries Included: No
Operating System: Windows Vista
Shipping Weight (lbs): 3
Dimensions (in): 6 x 2 x 8
MPN: 66I-00002
Model: 66I-00002
UPC: 882224172981
EAN: 0882224172981
ASIN: B000HCZ9AW
Release Date: January 30, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
| • | User-friendly software combines the features of Windows Vista Home Basic with even more impressive and user-friendly capabilities | | • | Features Windows Aero, an efficient and visually stunning interface that makes it easier to accomplish multiple tasks at once by providing a three-dimensional, real-time, animated view of all of your open applications, and documents | | • | By integrating search throughout the operating system, helps you quickly find and organize large collections of documents, pictures, movies, videos, and music | | • | Includes Windows Tablet and Touch Technology that enables you to interact with your Tablet PC-compatible computer with a digital pen or your fingertip instead of having to use a keyboard | | • | Includes all of the Windows Media Center capabilities for turning your PC into an all-in-one home entertainment center; enjoy music, photos, and DVD movies |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Windows Vista Home Premium is the preferred edition for delivering productivity and entertainment at home or on the go. It has a complete home entertainment system, with Windows Media Center, Photo Gallery, and Movie Maker. Connect and sync all your information, videos, photos and music from devices. Enjoy a stunning new visual experience with Windows Aero & Windows Flip 3-D. Find what you need quickly with Windows Instant Search, and use Windows Defender and Parental Controls to keep out unwanted or dangerous content. The new built-in Tablet PC technologies let you handwrite notes, sketch, or navigate on the run. Accomplishing more doesn't get much easier. Optimize PC performance and block pop-up ads with Windows Defender Instant searching -- find anything, anywhere on your computer, with a single click Windows Media Center - Share photos, music, TV and movies on devices across your home -- including your Xbox 360 Special safeguards help protect against hardware failure, user error and other causes of lost data Easier photo and video sharing with family & friends Updated Windows Defender, Parental Controls and self-diagnostics tools New Windows Aero user interface makes it easy to see & work with your information Integrated DVD burning and authoring allows users to seamlessly burn personal videos photos and files to video or data DVDs, and easily create professional-looking DVDs from home movies that can be shared with family and friends
Amazon.com
Windows Vista Home Premium (DVD-ROM) makes finding information, staying connected, and interacting with your PC easier and more secure. Whether you use your PC for organizing and sharing photos, watching videos and TV programs, balancing your checkbook, doing homework, or listening to music, Windows Vista Home Premium makes it easy to enjoy your computing time. An ideal operating system for homes with advanced computer needs, Windows Vista Home Premium combines the features of Windows Vista Home Basic with even more impressive and user-friendly capabilities. 
Windows Sidebar gives you quick access to gadgets like picture slide shows, Windows Media Player controls, or news headlines. You pick the gadgets you want to see in Windows Sidebar. View larger. | 
Use Flip 3D to navigate through open windows using the scroll wheel on your mouse. View larger. | 
Compare Windows Vista editions. | 
Use Instant Search to quickly find the information you need. View larger. | 
Windows Vista Aero provides spectacular visual effects such as glass-like interface elements that you can see through. | 
The redesigned Windows Media Center in Windows Vista lets you enjoy your media throughout your home, even on your Xbox 360. View larger. | It will help you use your laptop or desktop PC more effectively as well as enable you to take advantage of cutting-edge digital entertainment experiences--all with the benefit of added security and reliability. Breakthrough Windows Vista Experience
Designed to help you feel confident in your ability to view, find, and organize information and to control your computing experience, all editions of Windows Vista introduce a breakthrough user experience. The visual sophistication of Windows Vista helps streamline your computing experience by refining common window elements so you can better focus on the content on the screen rather than on how to access it. The desktop experience is more informative, intuitive, and helpful. And new tools bring better clarity to the information on your computer, so you can see what your files contain without opening them, find applications and files instantly, navigate efficiently among open windows, and use wizards and dialog boxes more confidently. Innovative User Interface
Windows Vista Home Premium has a new user interface named Windows Aero, which is both efficient and visually stunning. This new interface makes it easier than ever before to find your way around the operating system; it even makes it a snap to accomplish multiple tasks at once by providing a three-dimensional, real-time, animated view of all of your open applications and documents. Additionally, Windows Vista Home Premium helps you quickly find and organize large collections of documents, pictures, movies, videos, and music. By integrating search throughout the operating system, this software helps you quickly find exactly what you are looking for. Improved Mobility
Windows Vista Home Premium makes it easy to take your home computing experience with you wherever you go. For example, the system includes Windows Tablet and Touch Technology that enables you to interact with your Tablet PC-compatible computer with a digital pen or your fingertip instead of having to use a keyboard. Computers that include Windows Vista Home Premium and an auxiliary Windows SideShow display will also allow you to access key data even when your computer is off. You'll even be able to share files between other PCs in your household and to manage your laptop computer settings to more securely connect to your favorite Wi-Fi hotspot. More Entertainment Options
Windows Vista Home Premium has the power to improve every aspect of your digital entertainment experiences, including viewing and sharing photos, video, TV, movies, music, games, and more. For example, you can create your own DVDs and edit your own high-definition movies. The most exciting news, however, is that Windows Vista Home Premium includes all of the Windows Media Center capabilities for turning your PC into an all-in-one home entertainment center so you can enjoy your music, photos, and DVD movies. You can also use Windows Media Center to record and watch your favorite TV shows (even HDTV) and to access new kinds of online entertainment content. You will also be able to connect Windows Vista Home Premium to your Microsoft Xbox 360 to extend your Media Center experience to multiple rooms in your home.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 203 more reviews...
 A Decent Upgrade... February 2, 2007
CMOS (Chicago, IL)
141 out of 167 found this review helpful
BACKGROUND: I have used PCs and Macs on a regular, working basis, for 12 years. I approach each platform as a tool, not a social statement. Except where gaming is concerned, computers are tools and that's all they are. Just like a swiss army knife for the digital age. For some jobs the Windows tool has been more effective for me, for other jobs Mac OS X has been more effective. And it's not a question of "graphics vs. business", which is about the dumbest oversimplification in the history of modern computing. Anyone who tells you that does not use both platforms on a regular basis. If they did, they'd know both are robust in the range of jobs they can accomplish: accounting, charting, office, mainstream database work of all types (Oracle, SQL, Filemaker, etc), photographic and digital post-production, audio production and post-production, 3D modeling and animation, CAD, C/C++ programming, web development, mechanical drawing, presentations, spreadsheets, illustration... the list is ENDLESS. And almost without exception, every big name program is made not only for Mac and Windows, but many times Linux too. In short, if a person can't get a lot of great things done on either platform, the problem is the user, not the operating system. ; )
MY TAKE ON VISTA
XP PRO USERS: IF you have a fully updated, stable install of XP Pro and your apps are running efficiently, I do *not* recommend a Vista upgrade until MS releases the first major service update, which is likely to include some security updates too. Most experienced XP Pro users will not benefit from upgrading to Vista right now unless they love to play with new software and/or are an early adopter types who can trouble-shoot most problems.
WINDOWS 95, 98, ME USERS: 1) If you are not considering the purchase of updated hardware and software soon, YOU SHOULD. : ) If you ARE considering a new computer soon, and are using a much older system this probably means you are just a casual user, dabbling with internet, word processing and other simple tasks. For this group it probably makes sense to order your new computer with Vista, and not XP installed. Vista is a much nicer system than any of the older variants, and is also much more stable and more secure than the older systems. It provides useful information to you more quickly, it's easier on the eyes, is more capable in terms of its features, and in general is less of a PITA than these heavily outdated Windows systems.
Just be prepared to spend a good chunk of money on a fancier system than you're used to, because you're not going to run Vista efficiently without:
A) Lots of RAM (Gigabytes, not Megabytes)
B) Fast Processors (that's plural, as in, more than one - and at more than 2GHz a piece preferably)
C) A very powerful video card and a big hard drive (as in, more than 400GB)
INTERFACE: to be fair, Vista *does* borrow (and I use that term loosely) A LOT from Mac OS X, which is why people say it looks nicer. It *does* look and feel more streamlined and elegant, there's no question. All the new window transparency, sidebar widgets, streamlined glassy buttons... that was all inspired by Apple's OS design. That's a big part of why it took MS so long. Aside from problems making the clunky parts of XP better, MS was watching Apple update its system about every 18 months, in order cherry pick some of the best "bells and whistles" for Vista. Much easier watch Apple innovate every year, see what works, and then every so often... imitate. It's a little shameless, but honestly it's a good business tactic. I don't admire MS for this, but I understand it, and that's enough because as I say... computers are tools. Not "who we are". Yes Mac users (the ones I've known anyway) are creative thinkers, trend setters and take the road less traveled... but it's the quality of their work and their art, not their computer, that defines them IMO.
FEATURES: there *are* some new additions that make it easier to:
A) Get the information you need from online sources, without actually going online
B) Find files more quickly (once the LONG indexing process is completed - think hours, not minutes)
C) Organize files more easily, and in general get around the system more easily.
D) Work on your pictures, music, etc.
Sidebar: It's worth noting Apple is readying a major update as well, which -among several other things- will bring full 64bit support and a feature which lets users run XP Pro or Vista inside the Mac, at full speed, with all your peripherals. In fact, if you're willing to use a beta component, you can do that right now on any Intel-based Mac. There are even 3rd party virtualization products that will let you run Windows XP and Vista apps inside OS X (IOW, you don't have to deal with the MS Explorer, task bar, etc - just the window and tools of your Vista application).
SECURITY: sadly, because some idiots have nothing better to do, there will be attacks on Vista in the near future and some will be successful, that is guaranteed. Because every "digital delinquent" on earth is going to try and break it in some way, shape or form. There will be worms, trojan horses, all that stuff. The hope is that the number of those attacks that are successful will be fewer than with XP, 98, etc. I believe they WILL be fewer with Vista, but they will still be a concern. Vista has some holes that have already been exposed in programming circles. So IF YOU DO UPGRADE, don't relax and think you're safe from people trying to take over your computer, crash it or whatever. You're *not* safe. No Windows system will ever be truly safe unless it isolated from outside attacks (i.e. on a closed network where everything that goes in the machines is tightly controlled).
NEW TO COMPUTERS? For most purposes, you will want to at least consider getting a Mac, as the user experience is still preferable in my opinion to Vista and easier to learn. Apple is also using the fastest Intel processors available, so you're not giving up any speed or performance like in the old days. Things that bug me: Vista still requires a lot more time to drill down through dialog boxes and XP-like preferences, and is still not as intuitive from a user interaction point of view as OS X. Part of improving a computer interface is reducing its complexity, not just making it more attractive. Sadly, in some areas MS borrowed the attractive part of Apple's designs, but not the simplicity.
PS - some may wonder: will I be running Vista on my Mac Pro to get some of my work done? Yes. I will run both Vista and OS X in their latest incarnations, but both from the Mac to save on hardware expenses. Good luck and happy computing, Vista or otherwise!
 Not exactly "Wow," but then, I'm sort of glad for it--no problems, at any rate March 20, 2007
Squonk (The dark forests of Pennsylvania, where hunters follow by moonlight my silvery trail of tears)
138 out of 164 found this review helpful
If you've been living under a rock for the past year or so, perhaps you can be excused for not having heard about Microsoft's new edition to the
Windows canon. For all others, Vista has become a fact of life, whether or not you actually run the operating system yet. Check out a tech website and you'll find a Vista screen shot somewhere, either depicting some impressive overclocking results via CPU-Z, or else simply for no other purpose than to show the world, "Yes, I can run Aero--aren't you jealous?" In fact, it's hard to avoid Vista these days. And, as always seems to be the case, most of what you hear is probably negative.
That's where I come in. I've waited a while before writing this review, both to test the operating system and to wait for the horror stories to fade away. They haven't. And this can only mean one thing: the positive stories aren't getting through because most people who are satisfied with a product generally don't feel the need to comment on it. Now of course you've probably seen quite a few anxious posts (most likely in all capital letters) either bashing Microsoft for everything under the sun, praising Vista indiscriminately, making it seem as though you need a $5000.00 enthusiast-class computer to run the thing, or boasting about Mac's venerable OS X and how Windows Vista is nothing more than a bad copy thereof. Needless to say, none of these sorts of things helps, and all of them create a sense of confusion and negativity that reflects heavily on the product. And, if you analyze them closely, you'll realize that *none of them actually says anything about Windows Vista.* If you don't believe me, then just go visit Apple's discussion area and check out the iPod pages. You'd get the impression that iPods were the worst products ever made and that every single one has problems. Yet, if this were the case, then why have in excess of 100 million units been sold thus far? The answer is obvious: people seem compelled to review products only if something went wrong with their experience. In short, people confuse review sites with complaint forums.
Therefore, as the self-proclaimed Dr. Prog, I feel it my duty to step out of my usual mode of reviewing progressive rock albums and give an honest, no nonsense review of Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium.
-THE INTERFACE-
Ah, yes. You've heard all about the new Windows Vista Aero interface by now. And virtually every screen shot you'll ever see will feature Aero. But it's much more than just pretty, glass-like window frames. Aero includes many new enhancements to the UI, such as the live thumbnails that appear when you mouse-over minimized windows. As the name suggests, these actually update in real time, so if there is a video or an animation playing in the window, it will appear in the live thumbnail. This is very useful. Perhaps less useful but scoring about an 8 on the 1-10 "coolness factor" scale is the oft-mentioned 3D-Flip, which allows the user to view a three-dimensional representation of all open windows, along with offering the ability to virtually paw through these to bring the desired window to the forefront. These are the things you'll hear the most about.
What you don't hear so much is all the general changes that have been made to the overall interface. The new icons are photo-realistic and size-scalable. They start out a little large, but you can set them to any size within a wide spectrum. The explorer windows have been radically redressed, with a new breadcrumbs backward navigation tool that beats the old address bar hands down (you can retrace your steps in a logical, step-by-step manner, instead of using the cryptic addresses). Also, they're spruced up with decorations that recall the visual aura style of some of the new wallpapers. Speaking of which, these are for the first time actually usable, unlike in previous versions of Windows, where the wallpapers have been small and grainy.
More general changes include the absence of menu bars in most areas of Explorer, including IE. These can be replaced momentarily with a tap of the Alt key, at least until you learn how to navigate without them. Also, the animations are much better than in previous versions of Windows, particularly the one you see when copying a file. In addition, the Start menu has been reworked drastically. It doesn't even say "Start," anymore; instead, it's simply a blue orb with the Windows logo. The first big change is the way programs are accessed: gone is the delicate and finicky ever-expanding hierarchy system, where a slightly overzealous hand could miss the mark and close the entire desired level. Now, the All Programs button leads to an Explorer-like listing of folders, each clearly named, and each of which opens and closes with a single mouse click. Each time the Start menu is opened, the folders reset themselves. Also, they are automatically alphabetized. The Start menu also contains most of the system links usually found on the Desktop (Computer, Documents, etc.), which is why the only thing on the Desktop the first time you boot up is the Recycle Bin. And, in case you have seen screen shots or have tried out Vista already, the search bar at the bottom pulls double duty as a replacement for the Run command utility.
Speaking of search, though I seldom ever find myself wondering where my files are (I suppose I'm unique in this respect), many people have far more data to keep track of than me, and thus they will greatly appreciate the enhanced and pervasive searching facilities of Vista. There are search boxes virtually everywhere in Explorer, including the Start menu. There is even one in IE7, though it is not integrated with the system search.
But, as you've probably noticed, this is but a list of interface changes and additions. I assure you the list could go on and on, and I know I'll receive more than one comment reminding me about some feature or other I've forgotten. I'll read those when they come and add material as necessary. But, aside from this, how does this new interface really impact the end user? To be perfectly honest, though it's certainly pretty and a few parts of it required a little adjustment, it didn't feel much different from previous Windows versions to me. But, to be honest, this is a good thing. Perhaps you've heard that it's a nightmare to learn Vista. That's a load of hogwash. A few things are renamed, a few things have been moved around, and on the whole everything looks prettier. But it's still Windows; it accomplishes the same tasks and it works virtually the same as it always did.
-INCLUDED SOFTWARE BUNDLE-
Taking a hint from Apple, Microsoft has included a compliment of digital media manipulation software. While of course iLife is superior, there is one issue that must be cleared up: iLife is not an integral part of Mac OS X as you may have been led to believe. Older Mac users must purchase it; it only comes with the newer Macs. Therefore, Microsoft Windows Vista, to be purely technical, offers the most comprehensive digital media suite ever offered stock with an OS. However, technicality is seldom practical, and Microsoft's inclusion is no iLife killer. Still, the included calendar (new in Vista), photo viewing and editing application (new), Windows Media Player 11, Windows Movie Maker, and Windows DVD burning program (new) are nothing to scoff at. No, they won't replace dedicated, professional stand-alone programs, but let's be honest: neither will iLife.
The new Internet Explorer 7 is a step forward from the piece of Swiss cheese IE6 was, insofar as security. New features include a phishing filter, tabbed browsing, and improved security. Additionally, IE7 runs in protected mode, also called a "sandbox." The idea is that this one application is cordoned off from the rest of the system, thereby making it more difficult for malicious software to take control of your computer. But that's more for the security section of the review. The new IE7 is certainly more attractive than the older versions, and the version in Vista offers enhanced visual appeal that the XP port of the software lacks. To be perfectly honest, I still use Mozilla Firefox (mostly because I can't stand those blinking ads on Web pages, and there is a Firefox extension that gets rid of that annoyance once and for all), but if I had to, I would have no qualms using IE7.
The new incarnation of Window Media Player is really no different from the XP port. It still doesn't support AAC, and it still doesn't handle gapless playback. As an iPod user and a progressive rock fan, respectively, I can gather only one thing from these shortcomings: it's time to break out iTunes. Don't get me wrong: WMP is not at all a bad tool. It's still the default player on my system for most audio types. However, once an iPod owner and prog rocker, always an iPod owner/progger. I still say iTunes is king, if only because its interface is cleaner, it supports my audio device, and it offers gapless playback.
I haven't extensively tested the Windows Movie Maker application, but I have read that it is updated very slightly from the XP version. The photo editing tool is completely new for Vista, and after a little experimenting I was pleased that, though simple, the controls offer nice results. This application is on par with many of the basic image editing software packages you'll see offered with digital cameras, printers, and the like. The other applications have yet to receive my testing, only because I don't often burn DVD movies, and I haven't entered an event in a calendar in about ten years.
As far as Windows Mail, I cannot be objective because I have never used Outlook or Outlook Express. Reports seem to indicate that Windows Mail is simply a dressed-up Outlook Express, with many of the same features. As I said, I have never used a mail program. Call me old-fashioned, but I just check and write my mail from my Internet browser. Either way, I don't honestly believe Microsoft would offer Outlook-level functionality in the stripped down version of Outlook 2007.
All in all, I was rather impressed at the steps Microsoft has taken to embrace the digital media age. The effort falls short of iLife and proprietary solutions in this regard, but then, that is simply to be expected. I haven't really benefited tremendously from the new additions, but there is certainly nothing wrong with them, and I know many people will be very happy with this digital media suite.
-SECURITY-
This is the big picking point many people (rightfully) have with Windows XP. It seems as though there's at least two critical security updates every week. The Mac commercials definitely have a point, but that's only because Macs make up so small a percentage of the market share (though it is indeed a growing share) that it is not advantageous for malware to be written for OS X users. Even so, XP doesn't get a free pass here. Something had to be done. And that something was the security measures taken in Windows Vista.
The "sandbox" has already been mentioned above, but other features have been added. One of these, Windows Defender (Microsoft's anti-spyware program), is one of those rare pieces of software that is just perfect: It may not be the best at what it does, but it's unobtrusive, it's simple to use, and it's totally and completely free. Leave it on to supplement your already existing spyware solution, and you can only benefit.
Also featured in Vista is the now infamous User Account Control (UAC). Basically, it prompts you every time your computer does basically anything, including installing programs, running some programs, updating settings, etc. And, if you were wondering, the Mac commercials have it right: It really is that annoying. To be fair, you will see far fewer of these alerts once the bulk of your software has been installed, but until then you will be very, very sick of UAC. I don't advise this, but since I was able to get my anti-virus and anti-spyware software up and running on Vista, I finally turned off UAC. Symantic seems to think this was unwise, but Norton Virus Scan doesn't bother me about it other than to recommend, on its information page, that I leave UAC activated. Yeah. Like that's going to happen.
Beyond these broad, tangible aspects of security, there is a lot of new stuff under the hood of Vista that makes it less susceptible to malicious attacks. Mostly, unless you're very savvy, you don't need to understand it all and, to be frank, don't ask me because I haven't the foggiest how it all works. I'm just glad it's there.
Overall, I think Microsoft has made a valiant effort with security. I would still not advise running any Windows operating system without active virus and spyware protection, but at least Vista has taken a step in the right direction. Plus, you likely have anti-virus and anti-spyware software from running Windows XP, which you can then install on Vista.
-THE HARDWARE-
Graphics:
This is the part I have been waiting for. Everything I read up until I finally installed Vista told me I needed a dedicated graphics card with at least 256 MB of memory in order to run Aero. I'll be honest: I fell for it. I had a graphics card *in my hand*, but on the way to the checkout I realized I had left my gift certificate at home. So I decided to wait and see how my hardware would react. This is where I realized the utter bias among the tech community: I had absolutely no trouble running Aero on integrated graphics. And that only makes sense because my setup is rather typical: a 17" flat panel monitor and a modern computer. This will be what the majority of people have at the moment, and at this size, IG should have no trouble running Aero. Now use logic: If you want to run dual 24" widescreen monitors, yeah, you'll need a graphics card. Especially since I don't believe there even exists a dual monitor-capable IG motherboard (if there is such a thing, it's certainly not available on the OEM consumer market). But if you have a fairly typical single monitor scenario on a computer that you bought within the past few years, you should have no trouble at all insofar as graphics. Don't be fooled. If you want to be absolutely sure, however, there is no harm--and plenty of good sense--in downloading Microsoft's free Upgrade Advisor utility to see if your setup is in any way deficient. Plus, if you find you can't run Aero for any reason, you were going to upgrade to Vista anyway, so you can still buy dedicated graphics at that point. You don't need the top-of-the-line card unless you want to make this an excuse to foray into gaming; older technology that will get you up and running can be had for very reasonable prices.
RAM:
There is one area, however, where many computers will be deficient: RAM. Oddly enough, while many sources are pushing the graphics card brigade, an almost equally strong force--the computer manufacturers themselves--seems to think that RAM is no big deal. Trust me: If you've ever tried to run Windows XP on 256 MB of RAM, it's a painful experience. That's what Vista is like on 512 MB--you don't even want to go there. Dell is shockingly honest when they qualify the "minimum" Vista requirement of 512 MB of RAM (as per Microsoft) as "Great for booting the operating system, without running any applications or games." This is where most people will have to upgrade their machines. 1 GB is perfectly acceptable; if you want true multitasking power (and you have the dual-core processor to support it), then go for 2 GB or more. For most people, however, 1 GB will be fine. My first of two Vista machines has 1 GB and it works perfectly. I will warn you, though, that often times memory is installed in pairs, so your 512 MB is most likely two 256 MB modules. The paired method offers better performance, but it will make upgrading a system with only two memory slots somewhat expensive (though not exorbitant by any means). But this is not somewhere you want to skimp, so at least one pair of 512 MB memory modules should be on your list of extra hardware if you have only 512 MB of memory currently installed.
Processor:
This is perhaps the most accurate in terms of the hype. You'll need at least a 1 GHz processor to run Aero. Many computers with such processors don't even support 1 GB of RAM, so if you're in that situation, you will definitely be looking at a new computer with Vista pre-installed. However, these are very old machines by this point, and most of us have something slightly newer. One myth that needs to be dispelled is that dual-core processors will run Vista better than single-core CPUs: Vista is, for the most part, based on the Microsoft Server 2003 code, which is, in turn, based on the XP code, both of which came before the advent of multi-core processing. Therefore, to the effect that the operating system is run, there will be only a marginal difference between a single-core or a dual-core CPU, provided both use identical core architectures. Of course any applications that take advantage of multi-threading will benefit from multiple cores, but this was, is, and will always be the case, independent of the operating system. The question is simply whether you see yourself multitasking more with Vista. If that's the case, then a new computer with a dual-core processor installed is probably your best bet; if you're fine with your current setup, then it will most likely run Vista and Aero without any problems. It is interesting to note, however, that some upgrade aptitude utilities have some small quirks and will give conflicting and non-real results. For example, such a utility offered by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) passed both my A64 X2-based machines without a hitch. However, when on a whim I ran it on my old P4-based desktop, the utility seemed to think that a 2.40B GHz Pentium 4 Northwood (533 FSB) would be insufficient to run Vista. I smell AMD bias, even though I happen to favor AMD over Intel. Just take what such utilities tell you with a grain of salt, and remember that Microsoft's own utility is likely the most reliable. Generally, your processor will not be an issue when upgrading to Vista.
Hard Drive:
Again, this one is pretty straightforward. If you have a 40 GB hard drive or better, you're good to go. And if you don't have that, hard drives are so cheap these days that you could easily at least triple your current capacity for about what it costs to take the family out to dinner one evening (Amazon does not allow price figures, hence my vagueness regarding pricing throughout this review).
Things get interesting when you consider a dual boot scenario. This is when you have two operating systems running on the same system, either on the same or on different hard drives. In my honest opinion, this is the best way to go because you get to keep your current operating system (just in case you run into problems with Vista), and you also get to have Vista. Keep in mind that, in order to run Vista on the same hard drive as your current OS, you'll need to install each OS on a separate partition. You can either purchase a third party partitioning tool, or do what I did, which was use the Ubuntu Linux live boot disc's built-in partitioning utility. Of course there is risk involved with this last solution (but, in my experience, I've used it dozens of times with no problems), so do the latter only at your own risk.
-COMPATIBILITY-
This is where most of the horror stories have come from. Both hardware and software compatibility nightmares are flitting around in denser clusters than fish flies in June. Up until recently, anti-virus and anti-spyware programs have been unable to install on Vista. In addition, many proprietary printer applications are incompatible, yet the printer itself will often times function perfectly. Graphics and sound card drivers still haven't really caught up, despite the fact that they've had a little over two years to do so. I won't deny that, if your system just happens to roll the snake eyes, you're in for some hell.
But it's not half as bad as you hear. I installed Vista without a hitch; there is a separate part of the process where the OS scans the system for hardware, installs the necessary drivers, and then generates a list of anything that doesn't install properly. Every piece of hardware I had was recognized. In addition, my printer was recognized and installed in about five seconds, despite the fact that its own software would not install (and that its maker, HP, still hadn't posted a Vista-compatible version). Even my USB Internet modem, which the Upgrade Advisor flat out said would not work with Vista, installed and ran perfectly when I supplied the drivers from the manufacturer's website. The fact is, Vista has shipped with exponentially more drivers than any edition of XP. Plus, it's possible to supply drivers from manufacturers' websites for the odd, esoteric bit of hardware that isn't immediately detected. Sometimes it will work, sometimes not. But this is only to be expected when upgrading to a new OS. I don't seem to remember everything being rosy when XP came out, either. This is yet another item of strong support for a dual boot scenario.
Software is no different from hardware. All my software titles, with the possible exception of the ancient original Roller Coaster Tycoon, work flawlessly with Vista. And the latter didn't work with Windows XP MCE 2005, either, so I don't blame Vista for this. If your software acts buggy or otherwise just won't work, check the manufacturer's website. If it's a fairly recent title, there will most likely be some compatibility patches or a whole new version of the application, all free of charge. Just be ready to insert your product key, if required, in the latter case. Now of course chances are that if you have some pet application from the mid-nineties, it might kick up a few Dickens. Again, a strong case for dual boot.
The final and perhaps most prolific source of upgrade hell is, ironically, the upgrade itself. This process works by performing an in-place upgrade of an already existing operating system (XP). These sorts of upgrades are notorious for problems, and the Vista crop is no exception. However, since you're currently viewing the full version page, this obviously isn't an issue for you. Just remember, the best ways to install Vista are either as a clean installation (if necessary obliterating an existing OS) or a dual boot scenario. Anything else and you might experience problems. But this has always been the case with in-place upgrades.
-OVERALL-
I thank you for reading this far. Most people won't. I know this was pretty long, but I wanted to get it all out there for people to read. Vista is not a bad operating system. Was I absolutely floored with it? It may require some more time, but it hasn't been the revelation Microsoft promised. This is somewhat disappointing, and yet, somewhat reassuring as well. I didn't suffer any downtime because I couldn't figure out how the operating system works, I didn't have any glaring compatibility issues, and my computer has worked virtually error-free ever since I first installed the OS. In short, the change, while not mind blowing, wasn't drastic or disturbing, either. At the end of the day, just remember: It's Windows. Love it or leave it, it's just Microsoft's operating system. Vista will do the same thing as XP and earlier editions; it's not a source of inspiration or drive. It's only as good as the person who's using it.
 Devolution of computing September 17, 2007
G. E. Williams (California)
37 out of 65 found this review helpful
What are the guys at Microsoft Thinking???
Windows 3.1, a bad imitation of Mac, Windows 95... better, but still no Mac, Windows ME too bad to review, XP okay give or take the constant patching, a usable operating system, which is user friendly and reasonably trouble free, give or take security vulnerabilities.
Windows Vista, (which was the only option available with my newest laptop), is constantly crashing, will not run any software not specifically designed for it, including software I bought after the computer, for example Print Shop Deluxe (which made my DVD drive disappear to the computer, and I had to get tech support to find it again) and School House Fonts, both of which I need to use all the time when doing work for my wife's Kindergarten class (the reason I got this lap-top for in the first place was to do this kind of work in our room rather than going to one of our Desk Top PC's) , and including some that stated they were compatible, for Example Roxio 9 deluxe . The wireless connection is constantly fritzing out, and it wont network with our XP PC's, or TiVo.
Hopefully, the near universal disappointment with this version of Windows will result in a miraculous patch to resolve the issues, and the Next version will actually be an improvement.
My advice is hang onto your XP as long as you can, unless you are changing all of your computers at the same time, and in that case, maybe look at Apple, for me neither option was feasible, but such is life.
I hope you have better luck!
64-bit version NOT included January 30, 2007
aurick (Las Vegas, NV)
35 out of 43 found this review helpful
Does your computer have a 64-bit processor in it, like one of the AMD dual core or Pentium Core 2 Duo processors? Do you have more than 2 GB of RAM? If you want Windows to take full advantage of your computer's capabilities, then you need the 64-bit version of Windows Vista.
There's just one problem: That version is ONLY included when you buy the Ultimate Edition. If you buy any other version (like the Premium edition I bought today), then you'll find a card in the box that says the media you need isn't included. You then have to go online and order a DVD with the 64-bit version, paying $9.95 for this. Shipping is free, unless you want it expedited for another $6. (Reducing your wait to "up to 5 days" rather than the default "up to 10 days"). There are no options for faster shipping, either.
So if you want your computer to perform with the power that you bought your 64-bit CPU and extra RAM for, then you need to buy Ultimate Edition. Either that, or be willing to wait a week or two before you can upgrade. I guess the "Wow (really starts) Next Week".
(FYI, it's also now an hour since I placed my order for the 64-bit media and I have not yet received a confirmation email from Microsoft.)
Pretty stupid decision on Microsoft's part, if you ask me.
Bad Product, Bad Service June 16, 2007
Karsten Weide (San Francisco, CA)
30 out of 39 found this review helpful
Stick with XP for as long as you can. Buy a Mac. Get Linux. Cut a wide berth around Vista.
See my little story below.
We bought a brand new HP Pavillion with Windows Vista Home Edition pre-installed.
Hooked it up to the home network. The Vista machine did not see the XP machines on the network, and the XP machines did not see Vista.
Extensive resarch in help and online did not help.
Called MS to get free 90-day support. They sent me to HP since Vista was pre-installed. Policy!
Called HP to get free support. They asked me inane administrative questions unrelated to my problem for 20 minutes, I had to talk to three different people in India, some of them with an accent so bad I had a hard time understanding it. Then told me since this was a network problem, there was no free support, and some external service vendor would have to take care of it. Price point: 45 minutes, $69, no money-back guarantee if it didnt work. I said no thanks.
Called MS again, their price: $79 per call, ability to at least apply for your money back if they don't fix it. I waved the white flag and said I was willing to pay.
MS fixed it. The XP machines all needed an additional driver to even "see" the Vista machine on the network. --
My comments to Microsoft on Windows Vista:
1. Don't ship products that are broken. Networking is an integral part of modern operating systems, and yours didn't even work with the immediate previous version of it. Don't you have heterogeneous networks with XP and Vista up there in Redmond to see if networking works?
2. If you do ship a broken product and additional software is needed on machines with a previous version, why don't you use the handy auto-update function?
3. If you ship a broken product and I call you to fix it, don't make me pay for it. It should have worked in the first place.
4. Let me repeat this: If you ship a broken product and I call you to fix it, don't make me pay for it. It should have worked in the first place.
5. Don't put off Windows support to hardware vendors that use it.
I have professionally worked with personal computers for close to 30 years. Most of that time I have worked with PCs. Now, I am just fed up with stuff being broken, not working, being incompatible... I am also fed up with the disrespect with which the PC industry is treating their customers.
|
|
|
