The Civil War - A Film by Ken Burns (Boxed Set)

The DVDs not only provide a superior copy of the original series, but also contain a number of excellent features, including additional interviews and a wealth of other goodies. I had rewatched much of the series on video, but I found the color somewhat off. The DVD is a great improvement.

There are so many things to praise about this series. It isn't perfect, and not all will agree with the emphases. The interpretation follows fairly consistently that of James McPherson and Shelby Foote who saw slavery as the root cause of the war, unlike previous generations of historians who out of a respect to Southerners (I'm a Southerner, for the record, though I now live in Chicago) de-emphasized slavery and identified the cause of the war more with states's rights than slavery. But what can't be argued is the brilliantly vivid way that Burns and his collaborators manage to bring back to life a time long past. There are countless photographs and not just those by "Matthew Brady" (most of the photographs attributed to Brady where taken by his assistants, primarily Alexander Gardner, who deserves the reputation that Brady has), but from all over the United States. All the disparate elements are blended seamlessly to produce a nearly unblemished surface.

The quality of the voice-overs was, at the time of this series release, utterly unprecedented. A host of well-known individuals were used in the readings, but the principle ones were Sam Waterson as Abraham Lincoln, Julie Harris as Mary Chestnut, Jason Robards as Ulysses S. Grant, Morgan Freeman as Frederick Douglas, Garrison Keillor as Walt Whitman, journalist Charley McDowell as Private Sam Watkins, George Plimpton as George Templeton Strong, and a host of others. My favorite may be playwright Arthur Miller, who marvelously provides the gruff voice for the remarkable statements by William Tecumseh Sherman.

But despite all this excellence, one person managed to steal the whole show: Shelby Foote. It is simply shocking that amidst all these riches that many of the greatest moments of the show consisted of a lone Southern historian reflecting on the meaning of the war. Foote, although well known for his monumental narrative history of the war, was more or less an unknown. But the series made him a media star, a role that he refused to take on or exploit. Of the ten greatest moments on the series, perhaps seven of them involve Foote, whether explaining that the Civil War was the central event of American history, that it made us a nation (before the war people would say "the United States are" but afterwards they say "the United States is"), or eloquently talking of the brilliance of Nathan Bedford Forrest, or stating that Gettysburg was the cost the South had to pay for having Robert E. Lee lead the Army of Northern Virginia. He was partly his Southern drawl, partly his remarkable ability to distilling a point to its essence, and partly his mastery of words.

The great thing about this series is that even if you have read such classics as Douglas Southall Freeman's LEE'S LIEUTENANTS and his four-volume biography of Lee, McPherson's BATTLE CRY OF FREEDOM, and Foote's THE CIVIL WAR, Burn's documentary will make the war come alive in a completely new and exciting way. This set will therefore be essential viewing for all serious students of the Civil War, as well as nearly anyone even remotely curious about American history, or, for that matter, great television.


Should Be In Everyone's Collection   October 18, 2002
Samurai
29 out of 31 found this review helpful

Whereas critics may have chirped at Ken Burns' other documentaries like 'Jazz' or 'New York', there is virtually universal praise for this single, spectacular masterpiece. Not only is the Civil War brought to life but by the end of the entire 11 hour series you feel like you've been through the war itself.

The most important achievement of the documentary is showing how the war, with all its carnage, achieved the higher purpose of freeing the slaves. While the war may have started with the notion of keeping the tattered union together, it eventually brought societal, constitutional, economic, and medical changes that would have otherwise not come about had their not been a war. It truly was the birth of a "new freedom".

You watch as new innovative tactics are introduced out of sheer necessity. You see thousands of men using outdated tactics (charging a defense line with your bayonet) are mowed down by new weapons such as the gattling gun and the Repeating Rifle. You witness the banality of siege warfare as implemented by Gen. George McClellan. And you contrast that with maneuver warfare brilliantly executed by Stonewall Jackson and Nathan Bedford Forrest. You learn how the generals (and the country at large) grew to appreciate and utilize the telegram. You learn from General Lee how to lead from the front and how a few men effectively positioned can hold off 100 men. You witness how incompetent Union generals nearly lost the war to an inferior army. With only a rudimentary understanding in medicine, tens of thousands died from disease and from reparable surface wounds. However, without the enormous loss of life, we would have never made the medical and tactical advances that the war brought on.

More than any other character in the documentary, I enjoyed historian Shelby Foote the most. His amusing Mississippi drawl and the way he personalized the war made you realize the humanity of these legendary figures. He also highlighted how resentment towards blacks lasted for decades after the war (how the south still hates Lincoln, how Vicksburg refused to celebrate 4th of July for 80 years). You cannot possibly begin to understand US History until you have faithfully studied the Civil War. Thank you Ken Burns.


A must for anyoneys video collection.   May 10, 2000
dsrussell (Corona, CA. United States)
28 out of 29 found this review helpful

I could kick myself for not recording this PBS special when it aired almost ten years ago. Luckily, I was able to purchase this magnificent documentary, and I can tell you all that it is well worth the steep purchase price.

Ken Burns' artistic creation seems to be the standard by which all other documentary films are judged. It was a landmark film disecting a very complex subject. Using actors to read actual letters and quoting dialog from the war's participants, while showing the viewer startling photographs from the war, was a brilliant stroke. And the commentaries sprinkled throughout by the historians, especially Foote, gleaned an insight not often found in documentary films, and brought vividly to life the great battles and the terrible human cost that the people of the era (both male and female / north and south) had suffered.

If one wants to see how our nation grew up and is the country we have today, look no further than this epic as a starting point. I would also recommend the four-hour movie "Gettysburg", taken almost word-for-word from the late Michael Shaara's pulitzer prize novel "The Killer Angels", as a fine companion piece.

"The Civil War" documentary (nine video tapes--approximately 15 hours of viewing time) is a fine beginning for anyone thirsting for knowledge about our history. Those interested in the "Old West" may also get an insight, or at least an understanding, of where some of the most notorious outlaws and lawmen sprang, and possibly why they felt human life was so dirt-cheap.

Between 1 and 10, "The Civil War" rates the highest level possible. If films like these were available when I was going to school, maybe I wouldn't have napped so often in history class.


well researched but very biased and misleading   November 16, 2003
25 out of 83 found this review helpful

This film is produced by northerners and is very biased. Throughout the documentary, Ken Burns portrays Lincoln as the great emancipator and humanitarian. Lincoln told the nation when he was inaugurated he had no intention of freeing the slaves and he felt he had no right to do so. The emancipation freed no slaves at the time. It was a shrewd political move. He had power to free the slaves in the north and in the territories during the war but he didn't. He wouldn't where he could and he couldn't where he would. It also misrepresents the North and South's motives for fighting. 97% of Southern families owned no slaves. This film portrays the South as being full of cruel slave owners! U.S. General Grant owned slaves!! Ken Burns also forgot to mention that between 30,000 and 50,000 blacks, free and slave, voluntarily fought or aided the Confederacy. The South was fighting for the same thing their forefathers fought for in the American Revolution (independence from the rule of a tyrannical government). The Southern soldier was fighting to save state soverignty and constitutional liberty which northern radicals were trampling on. The South's agricultural exports were being taxed so heavily, many planters were being bankrupt. When the Southern states seceded, the north lost its biggest source of revenue. So what did they do? They forced the South back into the Union at gunpoint!! The north then began the sympathetic act of reconstruction. TEN YEARS OF MURDER, RAPE, PLUNDER, DESTRUCTION, AND NORTHERN DICTATORSHIP!! Do they explore these subjects in Ken Burn's Civil War? No. This documentary, if viewed, has to be viewed with caution. Research about reconstruction, black confederates, and the South's true reasons for fighting. The truth is out there...it just has to be found.